Luis Cerezal on X: "A challenge is to define the extent of glenoid bone loss (GBL) above which glenoid reconstruction is required (critical defect >25%; subcritical 15-20%, and minor defect <15%), the
Comparison of Two Different Glenoid Bone Loss Calculation Methods using Three- Dimensional Computed Tomography
![Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis Demonstrates Improved Reliability in Measuring Shoulder Glenoid Bone Loss Using a Two-Thirds Glenoid Height Technique Compared to the “Best-fit Circle” - ScienceDirect Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis Demonstrates Improved Reliability in Measuring Shoulder Glenoid Bone Loss Using a Two-Thirds Glenoid Height Technique Compared to the “Best-fit Circle” - ScienceDirect](https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0749806323005388-gr1.jpg)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis Demonstrates Improved Reliability in Measuring Shoulder Glenoid Bone Loss Using a Two-Thirds Glenoid Height Technique Compared to the “Best-fit Circle” - ScienceDirect
![Figure 4 from Accuracy and Reliability of a Simple Calculation for Measuring Glenoid Bone Loss on 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Scans. | Semantic Scholar Figure 4 from Accuracy and Reliability of a Simple Calculation for Measuring Glenoid Bone Loss on 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Scans. | Semantic Scholar](https://d3i71xaburhd42.cloudfront.net/f7a09c23baf33cf6a2389df27b17aae25adad09f/3-Figure4-1.png)
Figure 4 from Accuracy and Reliability of a Simple Calculation for Measuring Glenoid Bone Loss on 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Scans. | Semantic Scholar
![Insufficient consensus regarding circle size and bone loss width using the ratio—“best fit circle”—method even with three-dimensional computed tomography | Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Insufficient consensus regarding circle size and bone loss width using the ratio—“best fit circle”—method even with three-dimensional computed tomography | Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy](https://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00167-019-05391-9/MediaObjects/167_2019_5391_Fig2_HTML.jpg)
Insufficient consensus regarding circle size and bone loss width using the ratio—“best fit circle”—method even with three-dimensional computed tomography | Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
![Representation of the surface area-based method of measuring glenoid... | Download Scientific Diagram Representation of the surface area-based method of measuring glenoid... | Download Scientific Diagram](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326432304/figure/fig2/AS:649755994648577@1531925309443/Representation-of-the-surface-area-based-method-of-measuring-glenoid-bone-loss-Pico.png)
Representation of the surface area-based method of measuring glenoid... | Download Scientific Diagram
![Glenoid Bone Loss Determination: Validity and Reliability of the Constellation Technique Versus the Sagittal Best Fit Circle Technique | Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Glenoid Bone Loss Determination: Validity and Reliability of the Constellation Technique Versus the Sagittal Best Fit Circle Technique | Indian Journal of Orthopaedics](https://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43465-022-00720-6/MediaObjects/43465_2022_720_Fig2_HTML.png)
Glenoid Bone Loss Determination: Validity and Reliability of the Constellation Technique Versus the Sagittal Best Fit Circle Technique | Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
![Comparison of best-fit circle versus contralateral comparison methods to quantify glenoid bone defect - ScienceDirect Comparison of best-fit circle versus contralateral comparison methods to quantify glenoid bone defect - ScienceDirect](https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S1058274619305245-gr2.jpg)